The Obama administration will end in

Time Left

3 years 2 months

Phone fraud: Report it! Stop it!

The Maryland Blogger Alliance

Search Blogger 1947 entries

 

Blogger1947: Often irritated, never duplicated

Help us find Annie

My Barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world.

Visit Jewels Out of Time's ArtFire Shop

Please feel free to comment!

I welcome your comments, subject to moderation.

Ahmadinejad at Columbia University: UPDATE

posted Monday, 24 September 2007

Have you been following the flap at Columbia University over its decision to stand firm on giving Mahmood Ahmadinejad--a sworn enemy of the USA--a forum in which to speak on Monday, September 24?

This, despite the fact that Iran has had no diplomatic relations with the USA for some years, its shrill pronouncements about the destruction of Israel, the distinct possibility that the Iran government is supporting terrorist operations as well as insurgents in Iraq.

University President Lee Bollinger apparently believes that he is such a mensch that he will successfully be able to challenge Ahmadinejad on these issues. Columbia's web site includes the following statement from Bollinger:

In order to have such a University-wide forum, we have insisted that a number of conditions be met, first and foremost that President Ahmadinejad agree to divide his time evenly between delivering remarks and responding to audience questions. I also wanted to be sure the Iranians understood that I would myself introduce the event with a series of sharp challenges to the president on issues including:

  • the Iranian president’s denial of the Holocaust;
  • his public call for the destruction of the State of Israel;
  • his reported support for international terrorism that targets innocent civilians and American troops;
  • Iran's pursuit of nuclear ambitions in opposition to international sanction;
  • his government's widely documented suppression of civil society and particularly of women's rights; and
  • his government's imprisoning of journalists and scholars, including one of Columbia’s own alumni, Dr. Kian Tajbakhsh (see President Bollinger's prior statement).

In plain language, this paper-pusher has such an ego that he believes he can accomplish something that the combined diplomatic corps of the USA and UK, the United Nations, and God knows who else have been unable to do.

I would not bet you a small coffee from 7-11 that he'll prevail. "Alphabet" is a master of this sort of thing, and will manipulate the event to his disadvantage.

You can also make book that any anti-Iran sentiments expressed at the event will be sharply suppressed, while the entire panoply of moonbat behavior will be on display.

I am of the opinion that such an ill-considered decision ought to have consequences for Columbia, and that those consequences ought to include, at a minimum, the withdrawal of any and all federal support of the university, to include the repayment of any federal funds now on account there.

Predictably, Bollinger's e-mail address seems to be a state secret. So much for the spirit of openness.

However, the university web page does include the telephone and fax numbers of Bollinger's office, which I have repeated below.

May I humbly suggest that you spend the weekend flooding these numbers with voice messages and faxes?

phone: 212.854.9970,  fax: 212.854.9973

UPDATE: Monday September 24--"the day of..."

Those who were following the news over the weekend learned that Dean John Coatsworth remarked, in response to the uproar over Ahmadinejad's impending appearance, that they'd invite Adolf Hitler, if he were still living.

The New York Sun posted an editorial on that subject this morning. It reads, in part:

Jewish students at Columbia who went to their computers after breaking the fast for Yom Kippur were met Saturday evening with a link on the Drudge Report to an interview with the dean of the School of International and Public Affairs saying that he'd have been happy to welcome Hitler to the campus. The interview, aired on Fox News, was with John Coatsworth. He is seen in the Day of Atonement broadcast chuckling like a veritable Mearsheimer or Walt. Could he be oblivious to the impact his words were going to have in a Jewish community already on notice that its sensibilities were of little rank to either the president or the faculty of the university? Columbia, it seems, is bound and determined to honor the president of Iran and provide him with a platform to agitate against our country, and Israel, in midst of a war in which our GIs are facing Iranian backed forces on the field of battle.

Dean Coatsworth seems to be laboring under the illusion that had Columbia actually hosted Hitler in the late 1930s, World War II and the war against the Jews might have been prevented...

I don't think the timing of Coatsworth's stupid remark was specifically intended to offend Jews at Columbia, as the Sun implies. But it is ironic when an academic makes such a foolish statement without heed to the consequences. After all, these guys consider themselves the Conscience of America, microscopically examining everything that passes their noses to discern whether some "minority" may have been offended, intentionally or otherwise.

If only these "college" guys were half as smart as they think they are...

 

Could some New Yorker step forward and

"do the right thing?"

tags:      

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit



musicnotes


1. Muslims Against Sharia left...
Saturday, 22 September 2007 5:46 pm

Muslims Against Sharia condemn, in the strongest possible terms, the decision of Columbia University to provide a speaking venue for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Apparently letting Akbar Rafsanjani speak at the National Cathedral was not the height of American Dhimmitude, because providing a venue for the world's foremost anti-Semite, whose proclaimed goal is the destruction of the USA and Israel, definitely takes the cake. What is surprising is that we don't hear any complaints from Columbia alumni who should be ashamed of their silence.

More on the subject: http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=38223 Why Does Columbia host Ahmadinejad?


2. The "Arthur" himself left...
Saturday, 22 September 2007 6:16 pm :: http://blogger1947.blog-city.com/

Thank you for the comment. The URL for "Muslims Against Sharia" is http://www.reformislam.org:80/


3. mothanskin left...
Tuesday, 25 September 2007 6:52 pm :: http://mothanskin.blog-city.com

President Ahmadinejad does not speak for all Iranians even as President Bush does not speak for all Americans. The President of Iran is a revolutionary who unfortunately uses outdated revolutionary rhetoric. The President of the United States of America is neo-con who unfortunately uses outdated "cold war" rhetoric. Both countries need to get rid of the idiots that preside over them, in my opinion.


4. The "Arthur" himself left...
Tuesday, 25 September 2007 7:49 pm :: http://blogger1947.blog-city.com/

With certain reservations, I will agree with you. But I feel it necessary to point out some vital differences between Bush and Ahmadinejad.

First: we know what Bush's approval rate is with the US public, almost down to an hourly update. There is absolutely no way to know how many Iranian citizens approve of Ahmadinejad, because dissent is systematically and rather brutally suppressed in Iran. And you can't judge by the reax of Iranians in the USA, any more than you could gauge the mood of the USA from the expats living in Paris.

Second: I reject the characterization of either (much less both) of these men as "idiots." We have allowed that word to become shorthand for "someone for whom I feel no regard whatsoever." Bush, I believe, was put in an untenable position by September 11: war was declared against our nation by some entity other than another government. I think that anyone who had occupied the White House at that time would have made serious errors, because this is terra incognita, and it would appear there are no "right" answers. Ahmadinejad, on the other hand, knows exactly where he is headed, although he may not be able to predict the ultimate outcome. Moreover, he is--effectively--the leader of Iran until someone assassinates him, whereas Bush's term in office is strictly defined.

Third: What does tie the two together somewhat is that neither Iran nor the USA has had a competent head of state for several generations. I don't know who was in charge of Iran before Shah Pahlevi, but neither he nor any of his successors have been anything to write home about. And every US President since at least Herbert Hoover has left something to be desired.

Where the USA is concerned, it's entirely possible that the government organized by those gents back in the late 18th century was doomed from the start, because entropy always increases. What keeps me awake nights is not knowing where the USA is headed--even within the reasonable scope of my remaining lifetime (which according to the current actuarial info is another 18 years). Or, whether it is within the power of any individual, political party, ethnic sub-group, or military force to effect a change in that direction.

The neo-cons use the word "nihilist" as a pejorative. I reject that judgment. I think we are, in a word, screwed. No matter what we do.


5. mothanskin left...
Tuesday, 25 September 2007 11:00 pm :: http://mothanskin.blog-city.com

I rretract my use of the word "idiot" in reference to the two Presidents. I like the way you place the men in the context of the times we live in. In extraordinary times we need extraordinary leaders. I am believing these enlightened leaders will arise, even in our lifetimes! Keep the faith, Baby!