The Obama administration will end in

Time Left

3 years 1 month 29 days

Phone fraud: Report it! Stop it!

The Maryland Blogger Alliance

Search Blogger 1947 entries

 

Blogger1947: Often irritated, never duplicated

Help us find Annie

My Barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world.

Visit Jewels Out of Time's ArtFire Shop

Please feel free to comment!

I welcome your comments, subject to moderation.

Ellen DeGeneres is a bully: Updated

posted Wednesday, 17 October 2007

Don't you just hate it when some entertainment type tries to her or his "star power" to set an entirely separate set of rules for herself? For example, the way Rosie O'Donnell advocates disarming everyone in the USA except criminals and her personal bodyguards.

Now Ellen DeGeneres, the Other Famous Hollywood Lesbian, is having a go at this practice.

It seems that DeGeneres adopted a dog from a nonprofit rescue organization, then decided that the dog did not fit in with her other pets; cats, I believe.

Language in the adoption agreement required DeGeneres to notify the rescue organization if any problem occurred, and by signing it, she had agreed to return the dog to them in the event of a problem. Instead, she chose to give it to the family of a friend, without notifying the rescue people. When they learned of this, they visited the new household, and found it unsuitable for the dog, at least in part because of young children there.

Degeneres then compounded her mistake by going on her national TV show, sobbing into the camera about how poor Iggy was literally ripped from the arms of three bawling children who had come to love him so. Never mind her own responsibility for having created this mess.

Now, a "Free Iggy" movement has appeared, with a petition circulating among all the hapless nitwits who have discovered the Worldwide Web of late. According to a TownHall article, the pet-adoption folks have received death and arson threats.

To give you an idea of the level of stupidity at work among the "Free Iggy" crowd, consider this excerpt from on web site hawking the petition:


Oct. 17th, 2007 02:31 am (UTC)

I'm also apparently a bad cat owner* because PAWS and Homeward Pets denied Jay and I a cat. PAWS wouldn't let us have a kitten unless we took two (because a single cat would be "lonely") and Homeward Pets said we were horrible people because we would let a cat go outside.

*I think Saki and Manhattan would disagree.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Oct. 17th, 2007 03:36 pm (UTC)
I wouldn't call you "horrible"
...but I wish you would take more responsibility for your cats than to let them roam. There is a feline form of AIDS going around, largely because of people who believe their cats' lives are somehow incomplete if they don't get to prowl outside.

And my dogs, who are almost never outdoors unsupervised, end up with fleas that are spread by the cats roaming freely in our backyard.

Beside which, how would you feel if you found one of those stupidly-named cats of yours squashed in the road? Would you feel the slightest pang of guilt about your irresponsibility? Or would you be able to rationalize and tell yourself that the cat had lived a full and happy life before having its body burst open under the wheels of a truck?

missymango wrote:
Oct. 17th, 2007 03:47 pm (UTC)
Re: I wouldn't call you "horrible"
I have heard it all before, thank you.

And for the record, I don't take unsolicited advice from people who a) don't know my situation, and b) don't have the balls to post under their real user name.
blogger1947 wrote:
Oct. 17th, 2007 04:07 pm (UTC)
Re: I wouldn't call you "horrible"
OK. If that satisfies you, I have registered on LiveJournal.

As for my balls, if they were any bigger, I would not be able to wear trousers.

My name is Stan, I reside in Gwynn Oak, Maryland.

I don't need to "know your situation" any more than to know you admit that you let your cats roam outdoors.

That, from decades of experience, tells me you are one of those people who anthropomorphize their pets. I have known owners who refuse to spay or neuter, because they don't want to deprive the pet of a fulfilling sex life. That's projecting your own needs on the dog or cat.

And I have picked up enough "sail cats" off the highway to appreciate that there is absolutely no excuse for allowing an animal under your care to roam, thereby risking this horrible kind of death.

Of course, my years of experience with dog training, animal rescue, and being married to a former breeder and judge of show cats don't count for anything in your eyes. Nor does my experience of having lived among a colony of feral cats, I suppose.

It's amazing how many people like you are around, and how every one of you thinks he or she is an exception to the proven wisdom.
missymango wrote:
Oct. 17th, 2007 04:28 pm (UTC)
Re: I wouldn't call you "horrible"
As much as I enjoy a good flame war with strangers, the comments section of my friend's Live Journal is not the appropriate venue. As such, this will be my last post on this subject.

I don't care about the qualifications you may or may not actually have regarding the care of animals. My decision has been made, and you Stan of Gwynn Oak, Maryland, the Diane Fossey of the feral cat colony, may continue to sit pretty on your high horse and judge me all you want, you are not changing my mind.

Unfortunately, not everyone adopting a pet has the purest motives, and in other cases, unforseen changes occur that are not in the animal's best interest. Here in Maryland, a springer spaniel was adopted out to a single woman whose household later became shared with a live-in boyfriend. The boyfriend beat and abused the dog to the point that he was prosecuted and jailed for animal cruelty.

The adoption contract contained a provision under which Ellen agreed that if the dog could not remain in her household, it would be given back to the rescue organization. This is standard language in the world of animal rescue. Without it, a rescue operation could inadvertantly find itself supplying animals to test laboratories, or to be used as "bait" in the training of fighting dogs. The essence of the process is that the rescue agency assumes moral responsibility for the well-being of every animal passing through its hands, for that animal's entire life.
If the guy who provides the coffee and danish for the Green Room at the Degeneres show failed to deliver, you can bet she'd be suing his ass off. But apparently, like so many Hollyweird types, she is so full of herself that she does not think the normal rules of a contract apply. That's too bad, because I think she is one of, if not perhaps THE funniest comic actress in the business today. Apparently her talent fails her when it is time to be "serious" about something.
Life goes on, and I am sure that whatever happens to Iggy next, it will be an improvement.
UPDATE: 10:30 PM EDT
When I checked the web site for Mutts & Moms, which is run through PetFinder.com, I found the following statement. Earlier today, the URL was just returning a 404 error. This statement, which I am reprinting in its entirety, says what needs saying in this case better than I will be able to say it.

Mutts and Mom has chosen to temporarily inactivate their website on Petfinder.com because their email inbox and voice mail are overwhelmed. Petfinder has 11,000 shelters and rescue groups posting over 260,000 pets that need homes. We do not dictate the adoption policies of our members. We do work with them to educate their volunteers and hope to professionalize the industry as a whole, providing a positive experience for adopters. Petfinder advocates for all parties: the pets, the adopters, and the shelter and rescue group workers and volunteers.

Pet Return Policies

Many shelters and rescue groups insist, through their adoption agreements, that if a pet cannot stay with his adoptive family, the adopters must return him to the group. Why do they do this?

Between 500,000 and 1 million pets adopted from shelters and rescue groups find themselves homeless and in the shelter once again.

One foster mom said it best, "I found the dog on the street, starving. I nursed her back to health. She slept in my bed. I sang her back to sleep when she had nightmares when she first came to me. Then I adopted her to a wonderful family. A year later, I got a call from animal control because she was at the shelter and she was going to be euthanized. The family had gotten divorced and she ended up on death row!"

This too-common experience leads rescue groups and shelter to put strict policies in place governing what happens if the adoption doesn't work out. In effect, the rescue group and shelters are promising to always be there as a safety net for the pets. This can be very comforting to adopters.

Finding a New Home for Your Pet

Some pet parents, who have the best intentions for their pets, feel that they can do a better job of finding a new home for their beloved pet than a shelter or rescue group. Their rationale is that they know their pet best, they can keep it in their home until the perfect new home is found, and they can help ease the transition for the pet. Often times, this is a natural transition - a family member, trusted friend, or a colleague gets to know the pet, falls in love, and the ownership of the pet is unofficially transferred to them.

This is a controversial point of view, even amongst shelters and rescue groups who may feel that they have more experience identifying pitfalls and risk factors when identifying new families. Research, however, suggests that there is no difference in the success rates of the adoptions between organizations that screen heavily versus those that have more open adoption policies.

It also bears noting that shelters and rescue groups, understandably, want to keep in contact with new families to be able to lend their support and continue to get updates about the pets they cared for. So we have two groups, the shelter and the pet parents, who both want what is best for the pet, but who may have very different points of view. The silver lining is that everyone really wants the best home possible for the pet. If we could ensure that same future for all the pets available on Petfinder.com, our job would be accomplished.

tags:      

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit



musicnotes