The Obama administration will end in

Time Left

2 years 11 months 6 days

Phone fraud: Report it! Stop it!

The Maryland Blogger Alliance

Search Blogger 1947 entries

 

Blogger1947: Often irritated, never duplicated

Help us find Annie

My Barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world.

Visit Jewels Out of Time's ArtFire Shop

Please feel free to comment!

I welcome your comments, subject to moderation.

Decency, Schmecency

posted Monday, 22 May 2006

If you are of a certain age, you will remember how Justice Potter Stewart immortalized himself in a 1964 SCOTUS decision, when he wrote that while he could not define obscenity, he knew it when he saw it.

Such is the lather that the pecksniffs of the Parents Television Council and other allegedly faith-based lobbies have worked themselves into, and they have managed to pass the hysteria along not only to the FCC but to members of the US legislature, ever willing to ingratiate themselves to any puffed-up flock of loudmouths who spout off in the name of the Deity.

That cute bespectacled little fellow who runs the FCC (and who bears a striking resemblance to Harry Potter) heaved mightily and vomited forth a dictum that cited numberous occasions when the "f-word" or "s-word" were used on network TV. Mind you, he did not bother to define that the "f-word" might be fuck, leaving open the possibility that he was referring to faith, fruitcake, feces, french-kissing, or fanatacism. Likewise, it was unclear whether the "s-word" refers to shit, or whether it could equally be applied to concepts such as salvation, sacrifice, saliva, sacrament, security, or stupidity.

Ever eager (in an election year, at least) to pick up any fumbled ball, the legislative branch of government has drafted bills that would increase tenfold the fines that could be levied against those who broadcast indecent material. I have not read either bill in its entirety, but I can only presume that these laws contain a provision to contact the late Justice Stewart by seance or Ouija board for a reading on each particular offense in question.

The reason this is all so absurd is that regulating indecency--however it might be defined--in broadcast entertainment is a waste of time. (Incidentally, I think the salaries paid to Jay Leno and David Lettermen are indecent: does that count?) As I have been at pains to point out before, we do not yet live twenty minutes into the future, in the world of Max Headroom, where no TV set could be equipped with an "off" switch. And with the singular exception of medical waiting rooms, there are few places in the USA where you cannot simply change the channel if you are so horrified at what you're seeing.

Meanwhile, no law has been proposed to address the coarsening of life in the USA except in the world of broadcast entertainment. Oliver Stone and Michael Moore are free to do whatever pleases them. And our young people--The Promise of Tomorrow, remember--are free to wear tee shirts bearing legends like the one I saw yesterday in Home Depot: "The only job I need is a blow job."

Shame on this teenage brat for being so thoughtless, and double-shame on his mama for not smacking him across the mouth. But God help us if Congress ever gets wind of the fact that people are wearing indecent tee shirts.

 

tags:            

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit



musicnotes


1. Boris Epstein left...
Saturday, 27 May 2006 12:17 am

"The only job I need is a blow job."

This is fucking scary. I don't care much for the indecency angle - but the general attitude of caring nothing for anything outside of the most primitive desires is commonplace, and it is frightening.


2. The "Arthur" himself left...
Saturday, 27 May 2006 5:16 pm

Boris, I am essentially on the same page as you. I believe I've told you about my dad, who was possessed of a rather salty vocabulary, which I had learned to use by the time I was out of grammar school.

Nevertheless, when I entered the US Army, I was astounded to discover what a rank amateur Dad was, when it came to swearing and cursing. (Amazingly, I heard one retired General Barry McCaffrey interviewed by Diane Rehm a few years ago, and his recollection was that the Vietnam era platoon sergeants and commanding officers were benevolent father figures, and the military a splendid place for nurturing adolescents.)

There was once a concept among Americans called "company manners." The crux of it was that while you might be allowed a certain laxity at home among your immediate family, when you were entertaining, and perhaps more so when you were in public, it was expected that you would moderate your language and your basest impulses. For example, Dad taught (by example) that having lustful thoughts about a woman was one thing, and giving voice to them quite another altogether.

And as you so astutely observe, it's not actually the language that's so troublesome, as the attitude that underlies it. More than once I have asked some young person to tone down her/his language while within my earshot, and almost to a person, they became indignant at my intrusion upon their "freedom."

At the very root of things, "indecency" pales next to the fact that so many people (and not all of them teenagers, BTW) do not see themselves as a cog in some larger universe, but rather the very center of the universe itself.