The Obama administration will end in

Time Left

3 years 1 month 29 days

Phone fraud: Report it! Stop it!

The Maryland Blogger Alliance

Search Blogger 1947 entries

 

Blogger1947: Often irritated, never duplicated

Help us find Annie

My Barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world.

Visit Jewels Out of Time's ArtFire Shop

Please feel free to comment!

I welcome your comments, subject to moderation.

Ignoring the UN's gun-grab program

posted Wednesday, 19 July 2006
 Writing recently in the Wall Street Journal, David Kopel notes that the UN’s ten-day Review Conference on Small Arms occurred with hardly a notice by the mainstream media. Paraphrasing  and excerpting Kopel’s article:
 
NRA members sent more than 100,000 postcards and letters in protest of the conference’s ideology, prompting the conference chair, Prasad Kariyawawam (Sri Lanka) to insist—disingenuously—that the conference did not address the legal, civilian ownership of firearms. Secretary-General Kofi Annan seconded the statement.  
But the U.N. has long urged that firearms must never be transferred to "non-state actors" -- that is, entities which are neither governments nor government-approved. [This rule would] make it a violation of international law to sell arms to Taiwan (according to the U.N., not a state). It would also make illegal arms sales to any and every current group resisting tyranny or genocide.
[But] the U.N. does not talk about the extreme human rights violations being perpetrated on behalf of U.N. gun control. Some examples: 

In the borderlands of Kenya and Uganda, joint military operations are burning villages, confiscating cattle from the pastoral tribes, torturing, murdering, pillaging and turning over 100,000 people into refugees, many of them starving. These atrocities are being perpetrated pursuant to the Nairobi Protocol, a U.N.-led regional treaty which obligates the signatory governments to eradicate unlicensed gun possession.

The Economic Community of West African States (Ecowas) has under U.N. leadership banned the import of all firearms, except those for government use. Although human rights groups have warned that two Ecowas countries -- Ivory Coast and Guinea -- are on the brink of genocide, the U.N. seems determined to keep the potential genocide victims as helpless and defenseless as the genocide victims in Darfur.

Kopel observes that the UN bureaucrats and gun-prohibition lobbies were aware they would not reach their goal at this year’s conference, but aim to keep this line of discussion open in future years, looking forward to a time when a new President, such as Hillary Rodham Clinton, John Kerry, Al Gore or Michael Bloomberg might be willing to sign on to an international gun-control treaty that would supersede the provisions of the US Constitution.

 
Not only would that open the door to the forcible disarmament of law-abiding Americans, it would set a precedent that could eventually undermine our entire Constitution, in favor of some unspecified form of “world government.” 
The gun prohibition lobbies are already working to claim that there is an
international "norm" against citizen gun possession. (An international
"norm" is similar to common law -- as opposed to international law created
by formal treaties.) Our own US Supreme Court, recently cited
unratified treaties as evidence of international norms which should guide
the interpretation of our Constitution.
Kopel’s conclusion deserves to be quoted in full:
“The U.N. gun control program, of which this week's small arms conference is
a part, has already caused massive suffering and the loss of civil liberties in many nations around the world. Americans would be foolish to imagine that they will always be immune.”

tags:        

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit



musicnotes